Showing posts with label House of Cards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House of Cards. Show all posts

Thursday, 10 March 2016

HOUSE OF CARDS cast and crew should shoot their own version of Richard III onset when HoC wraps

If Joss Whedon can shoot Much Ado About Nothing over a weekend the House of Cards team deserve to treat themselves to the original inspiration when it finally ends.



I've just seen HoC S4. I would urge you not to binge it, as I have, as it is worth savouring.

I said here http://corben-dallas.blogspot.nl/2014/10/the-underwoodurqhart-easter-house-of.html
contemplating Underwood as President

"I'm left  at the end of S2, realising that Spacey as in Se7en has an inexorable plan coming to fruition"

In the event S3 was quite disappointing as the Underwood's just seemed content with their level of power. Looking back House of Cards Season 3 is essentially West Wing with a bad hangover. I thought Francis had replaced the bloody ribs with peanut butter sandwich's. I was wrong.

<SPOILER>

The supremely chilling end to S4, when Francis and Clare both address the camera for the first time, confirms their apparent benign rule so far is only due to having such an easy ride so far. Now they have the power they have no intention of letting inconvenience's like democracy and a free press take it away from them.

</SPOILER>

Made me think.

A few years ago Jess Whedon invited some of his regular cast and crew over for a weekend party and then  announced he was going to shoot a movie over the weekend

result was this


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Ado_About_Nothing_(2012_film)

and it is much much better that you might expect from something shot over a weekend.

HOUSE OF CARDS is of course based on the British tv series and books by Micheal Dobbs but the original inspiration for all that rich villainy was of course Richard III (all that speaking at the camera for one thing).

I have heard budget on HoC is an issue. Every episode of the show looks like it cost $150 but product placement is easy to spot. I suspect there might be a quite a story on HoC got financed in the first place.

BUT
I think cast and crew (and audience) deserve, maybe instead of a wrap party, to have one day over when this momentous show finally ends,  please shoot a version of Richard III onset with available actors, costumes sets and resources. Could we crowd source it? Shall I start a petition?

Kevin Spacey has some recent familiarity with the dialogue

http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2011/jul/03/kevin-spacey-richard-iii-review

My main exposure to Richard III is via Ian McKellan's absolutely spectacular alternate history fascist 1930s version. I once rather foolishly forced some rural teenagers to watch it on a Friday night, to prove a point about Shakespeare, and it a famous success, we all roared with laughter (mostly)



Thursday, 4 February 2016

Can't wait until next series of HOUSE OF CARDS? try the Evil Legals in DAMAGES (2007-12)

A powerful, utterly ruthless, completely amoral central character who uses everything up to murder to get their own way, yet seems to contain a vestigial conscience?

Slick Fincher like direction and design, taking a well known location and giving it an evil HD sheen?

Gripping violent conspiracy thriller plotlines that border on late career Brian De Palma?

Opening sequence full of stark judgmental Greek statues laid beneath a very distinctive font?


Hey HOUSE OF CARDS fans ... does the opening sequences to FX's (2007-12) legal thriller DAMAGES look familiar?

Just swap Frank Underwood's Washington for New York and the legal system for politics and you pretty much have Damages, which, although looking like an effective imitation actually pre-dates (the US) House of Cards by about five years.

I discovered Damages on Netflix at the weekend. I can only assume S3-5 are terrible because S1 was great and yet I'd never heard of it. Damages Season 1 is one long murder strewn legal conspiracy thriller told with a lot of style and a few surprises, perhaps best seen as a long Fincher like movie.

Like House of Cards but perhaps more so it forces you to sympathise with  ant-hero against forces which are even worse. In HOUSE Frank Underwood has Raymond Tusk and Petrov - in DAMAGES S1 Glen Close's ruthless attourney Patty Hewes has as an arch enemy in.. Ted Danson. Yes UK viewers, , the guy from CHEERS. Perhaps this is why this show is not taken quite so seriously, a shame as Danson's Bernie Madov type embezzler, Arthur Frobisher, is a fantastic villain, subtly evil in a way that is worthy of BBCs Sherlock, a wonderfully nice and charming family guy on the surface to everyone, who is nevertheless a ruthless swine not far beneath the surface

Don't mistake me. House of Cards looks maybe slightly less original now but is still on the whole better acted written and shot than but Damages - it isn't light years ahead, and if you are that desperate for something similar you could do worse.

Ultimately the difference between the two is bigger budget, better writers, star directors and actors and a more interesting central concept (Richard III in 20th/21stC),
but for all that if you are hankering to immerse yourself in House's high power environments of vaguely sympathetic murdering bastards
(but can't quite plum the moral depths of far out depravity with HANNIBAL)
DAMAGES is a good substitute.

Friday, 10 October 2014

The Underwood/Urqhart Easter (House of Cards US and UK versions compared)

<I'm about to start a Masters course so I'm uploading all the blogposts written but not posted for various reasons. The first of these didn't get posted last Easter.>

"I wish things were that ruthlessly efficient...It's true. I was looking at Kevin Spacey thinking, 'this guy's getting a lot of stuff done'"
Barack Obama on the second series of HOUSE OF CARDS 

Stuck for something to do over Easter? I can't recommend it for family viewing but I was up until 2am recently watching to the end of S2 of House of Cards - US version. I've binge watched S1+S2 over the last week. As everyone says it is perfect 'boxed set' watching, it slides down very very easy, like port. (And like port you feel faintly unpleasant afterwards)

I was up until 2am watching to the end of S2 of House of Cards - US version. I've binge watched S1+S2 over the last week. It looks sensational, every inch a David Fincher (Fight Club, Social Network, The Game) production, eventually becoming a gripping White House drama like the West Wing, but more realistic in every depiction of US government - except the level of achievement. 

The power couple in charge, played by Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright, both hypnotic, grow within the sheen of Fincher's camera to look more and more like the vampires in Tony Scott's The Hunger. A scene were they seduce their own secret service bodyguard is creepier than anything in Tony Scott's horror movie.

Even weeks later I could not get the music and opening titles of House of Cards out of my head, and again it is one of those US shows where even though you've seen five episodes in a row you still watch the titles. The camera glides around an empty twilight Washington as if it were a cyberpunk Transylvania, complete with lifeless figurines and giant mausoleums,  masterfully suggesting the seductive and ultimately toxic nature of the setting.


I'm left  at the end of S2, realising that Spacey  as in Se7en has an inexorable plan coming to fruition, just as I have an inexorable need to eat the southern fried ribs from Freddy's BBQ joint. As brilliantly played by Reg E. Cathey, watching Freddy getting dragged into the Washington cesspit is a subplot worthy of a movie itself.

Thankfully there is enough of a conscience within me to hope the US series of House of Cards ends with with Frank Underwood being revealed a a puppet of Leslie Knope (from Parks and Recreation, something else I've indulged in recently).

Next Easter I may well watch the whole thing again, perhaps with ribs.



BBC's House of Cards (watched after the US version)

Watched immediately after the US version, the BBC version of House of Cards looks as cheap and tacky as Open All Hours. Comparing the opening titles and music between US and UK versions is particular painful.

The hideous 80s / 90s women's fashions don't help. I went through a stage in the 80s when dungarees were the sexiest thing a woman could wear. One look some of the colourlessness bagging poor Mattie Storin is forced to parade around in and you can see why dungarees seemed like the black suspenders of the decade, Susannah Harker was awarded a deserved BAFTA for the role and I hope it was worth the embarrassment,

Once you have adjusted to the horror of looking at that era you realise it has a stack more charm than the deadly cold US version, which is more "Veep for Vampires"  rather than the often repeated "West Wing For Werewolves". Before you reach the end dated nature of the BBC series has actually become a big positive.

I have not read the Andrew Davies books on which these series are based, I suspect they contain a lot more detail on how the Urqharts/Underwood's work as a married couple - which is fleshed out more in the US version thanks to the broader scope and budget. I remember the books were nauseatingly trendy among the chattering classes in the late 80s and quickly fell out of favour after 'distasteful' speculation about events post the death of Mrs Thatcher (which history finally caught up with recently). These decades of passed time gives the the UK House of Cards a whole new perspective. If the original House of Cards now looks initially like a cheesy prototype for the current US version, watched from a 21st century perspective the original series eventually becomes gripping alternative history :  -namely what if the mild. bland successor to Thatcher, John Major, was Richard III?

Though the first of the BBC series will be familiar from watching the US version, the much maligned (at the time) second series, dealing with FU's management of the new King will seem quite fresh. There is what appears to be informed detail about the Monarchy and what was once treasonous fantasy about the inner workings of government after the breakup of Charles and Diana's marriage now looks quite insightful.

It must have scared the hell out of the royals and the mutual contempt between royals for the press is laid bare throughout House of Cards second season.

As Davies was a close Thatcherite insider it is difficult not to see it all as historical confession on the attitudes and ruthlessness of the whole era. Sadly, for all it's tastelessness predicting the death of Mrs Thatcher and the current Queen, the real world hounding to death of Diana at the hands of the press was too depressing a plot even for the mind of Andrew Davies and Francis Urqhart to imagine.